Thursday, April 07, 2005
Scientific and Mathematical Proof For Flat Earth Theory
Texas Scientific Journal
Scientists claim to have found strong evidence to support the Spinning-Coin Theory of the earth, which is a branch of the Flat Earth Paradigm. Using physics and math, they have come up with evidence that contradicts our pre-existing misconceptions about the earth. Under this model, the earth, rather than being a sphere, is a disc that is being spinned like a coin by a higher being. Scientists claim that this model offers a better explanation to many everyday questions, ranging from temperature to earthquakes, than the currently accepted models.
One of the things that it explains is why the climtate is so hot around the equator and so cold around the poles. The models we currently have explain this by suggesting that the sunlight has to travel less distance to get to the surface around the equator than it does at the pole, due to geometry. The contraditions in this explanation lie in the fact that the atmosphere is so thin compared to the radius of the earth that it couldn't possibly cause that much difference in temperature, and the idea that for half a year one pole is facing the sun at all times, which means that pole should get extremely hot. However, the Spinning-Coin Model provides a simple convincing argument involving energy considerations. In a spinning coin, the velocity at the equator is much greater than it is at the poles. And it is due to this high velocity that the energy there is so great. Energy is defined as 1/2 mass times velocity squared [E=1/2 *mv^2]. This equation clearly shows that sunlight and atmosphere are not factors at all, since the energy is only a function of mass and velocity.
The Spinning-Coin patches the holes in explaining why astronauts feel "weightless" in space. Gravity is not due to the mass of the earth, but rather due to the spin. In NASA, gravity is simulated by spinning the astronauts at different rates, not by putting them in a different sized rooms. If the pre-existing model of gravity is used, astronauts should not feel weightlessness until they reach infinite distance, which is impossible. But the Spinning-Coin model would show that as soon as you exit the earth, you are no longer subjected to the spin, and therefore weightless.
This model also explains why one cannot dig a hole to the other side of the earth to get to China. The pre-existing model suggests that the radius of the earth is too large for one to do so. But simple math will show us that it's not impossible to do if the earth was, indeed, round. The diameter of the earth is 8000 miles which is approximately 42 million feet. Human beings have existed for 1 million years, which means we only have to dig 42 feet per year, or 0.11 feet per day to accomplish this. Flat Earth Theory offers a much better explanation. The reason one can't dig a hole to the other side of the earth to get to China is because China and the US are on the same side of the earth.
Can the spinning of the earth and earthquakes be explaned in a unified model? Perhaps. One question that has puzzled scientists is "how does the earth keep spinning?" The scientific community has not come to an agreement on this, but one model suggests that God flicks the coin-earth every once in a while. This would explain why the earth continues to spin, and at the same time explain earthquakes. God doesn't flick the earth at the same place everytime, which explains why earthquakes happen all over the world. If we were to use our pre-existing models, earthquakes should happen at the same area every time, because the energy will always release at the weakest point (which is the point that failed last time).
Some skeptics point to Columbus. "How could Columbus have travelled around the world if the earth was flat? Wouldn't he simply fall off the edge?" However, this skepticism falls flat when scientists explain that Columbus simply went around the circumference of the earth. There is even pictorial evidence to prove this (See Fig.1).
Fig. 1 (Courtesy of Bob Jones University)
Other skeptics might also ask, "how does this coin earth keep spinning? The coin earth spins because the higher being keeps it spinning, by either blowing on it or flicking it. That's why we have earthquakes and tsunamis. If the earth was round we shouldn't have tsunamis because a sphere is aerodynamic, and it wouldn't make sense to blow on it. This also explains why ships mysteriously disappear around the Bermuda Triangle. Mass can not be created or destroyed, but they can be accidentally flicked off the surface of the earth.
Finally skeptics will ask about the phenomenon of day and night. "How can parts of the world be light and part be dark if the the earth was flat?" That's because light travels in waves.
Scientists claim to have found strong evidence to support the Spinning-Coin Theory of the earth, which is a branch of the Flat Earth Paradigm. Using physics and math, they have come up with evidence that contradicts our pre-existing misconceptions about the earth. Under this model, the earth, rather than being a sphere, is a disc that is being spinned like a coin by a higher being. Scientists claim that this model offers a better explanation to many everyday questions, ranging from temperature to earthquakes, than the currently accepted models.
One of the things that it explains is why the climtate is so hot around the equator and so cold around the poles. The models we currently have explain this by suggesting that the sunlight has to travel less distance to get to the surface around the equator than it does at the pole, due to geometry. The contraditions in this explanation lie in the fact that the atmosphere is so thin compared to the radius of the earth that it couldn't possibly cause that much difference in temperature, and the idea that for half a year one pole is facing the sun at all times, which means that pole should get extremely hot. However, the Spinning-Coin Model provides a simple convincing argument involving energy considerations. In a spinning coin, the velocity at the equator is much greater than it is at the poles. And it is due to this high velocity that the energy there is so great. Energy is defined as 1/2 mass times velocity squared [E=1/2 *mv^2]. This equation clearly shows that sunlight and atmosphere are not factors at all, since the energy is only a function of mass and velocity.
The Spinning-Coin patches the holes in explaining why astronauts feel "weightless" in space. Gravity is not due to the mass of the earth, but rather due to the spin. In NASA, gravity is simulated by spinning the astronauts at different rates, not by putting them in a different sized rooms. If the pre-existing model of gravity is used, astronauts should not feel weightlessness until they reach infinite distance, which is impossible. But the Spinning-Coin model would show that as soon as you exit the earth, you are no longer subjected to the spin, and therefore weightless.
This model also explains why one cannot dig a hole to the other side of the earth to get to China. The pre-existing model suggests that the radius of the earth is too large for one to do so. But simple math will show us that it's not impossible to do if the earth was, indeed, round. The diameter of the earth is 8000 miles which is approximately 42 million feet. Human beings have existed for 1 million years, which means we only have to dig 42 feet per year, or 0.11 feet per day to accomplish this. Flat Earth Theory offers a much better explanation. The reason one can't dig a hole to the other side of the earth to get to China is because China and the US are on the same side of the earth.
Can the spinning of the earth and earthquakes be explaned in a unified model? Perhaps. One question that has puzzled scientists is "how does the earth keep spinning?" The scientific community has not come to an agreement on this, but one model suggests that God flicks the coin-earth every once in a while. This would explain why the earth continues to spin, and at the same time explain earthquakes. God doesn't flick the earth at the same place everytime, which explains why earthquakes happen all over the world. If we were to use our pre-existing models, earthquakes should happen at the same area every time, because the energy will always release at the weakest point (which is the point that failed last time).
Some skeptics point to Columbus. "How could Columbus have travelled around the world if the earth was flat? Wouldn't he simply fall off the edge?" However, this skepticism falls flat when scientists explain that Columbus simply went around the circumference of the earth. There is even pictorial evidence to prove this (See Fig.1).
Fig. 1 (Courtesy of Bob Jones University)
Other skeptics might also ask, "how does this coin earth keep spinning? The coin earth spins because the higher being keeps it spinning, by either blowing on it or flicking it. That's why we have earthquakes and tsunamis. If the earth was round we shouldn't have tsunamis because a sphere is aerodynamic, and it wouldn't make sense to blow on it. This also explains why ships mysteriously disappear around the Bermuda Triangle. Mass can not be created or destroyed, but they can be accidentally flicked off the surface of the earth.
Finally skeptics will ask about the phenomenon of day and night. "How can parts of the world be light and part be dark if the the earth was flat?" That's because light travels in waves.
# posted by Truthful Propagandist @ 2:51 PM 
